top of page
SQL logo

by Square League

The Future of IT, India’s Most Genuine Blockchain Company


Introduction


Many listed Indian tech companies talk about blockchain. Most have pilot projects, R&D labs, consulting divisions, or a few prototypes in enterprise solutions.


But very few have blockchain embedded into the heart of their products, not just used as a feature, but as a foundation.


That’s exactly why this question keeps coming up:


Which Indian listed company truly deserves to be called a blockchain company?


When you dig deeper, one name repeatedly stands out: Tanla Platforms.

It’s not as mainstream a name as TCS, Infosys, or Wipro in the stock market. But in the world of communication platforms, trust-tech, and secure messaging infrastructure, it has quietly built something different.


And what makes it interesting is not just that it uses blockchain, it’s the scale and depth at which it is integrated into the core architecture of its products.


Not because it markets blockchain.Not because it is experimenting with blockchain.Not because it has a few pilot deployments.


But because its products, customers, and recurring revenue are fundamentally powered by blockchain every single day.


That’s the difference. And that’s what makes it arguably the most deserving contender to be called a true blockchain company among India’s listed tech firms.


1. Blockchain at the Product Layer, Not Just as a Service


Most Indian IT giants treat blockchain as one more service line.

It sits alongside cloud migration, app development, cybersecurity, and a hundred other offerings. They build blockchain solutions when clients ask for them, but their business doesn’t depend on it.


If blockchain vanished tomorrow, their revenue models would barely notice.

But Tanla is different.


Its flagship platforms – Wisely, Wisely ATP, TruBloq, and the consent and trust solutions- are not “blockchain-enabled” in a casual sense. Blockchain is embedded into how the platform verifies messages, maintains audit trails, manages consent, and prevents tampering.


In simple words, if you remove blockchain from these products, the products would stop being what they are. That is the key difference.


This is why Tanla doesn’t talk about blockchain in abstract. It uses blockchain for a very practical, high-volume problem: trust and transparency in digital communication.

And these are not experiments. These are daily, large-scale, enterprise-grade operations.


2. Real Revenue Coming from Blockchain-Dependent Products


Revenue is the best reality check.

Many companies claim innovation, but very few earn regular income from it.

Tanla’s blockchain-backed platforms generate recurring, transaction-based revenue from enterprises and telecom operators. That’s something even big IT firms rarely achieve with blockchain.


Think about it this way.


A large bank or a telecom operator uses Tanla’s platform to send millions of messages every day. Each message is verified, secured, or checked on a blockchain-based system. They use it to send OTPs, transaction alerts, service notifications, and regulatory or customer-communication messages to their users.


For Tanla, every verified message is revenue. It is not a one-off consulting project. It is not a prototype. It is a running business model.

This makes Tanla one of the few Indian listed companies where blockchain is not just a jargon, it’s a revenue engine.


3. Tanla, Blockchain and Trust


For many years, people in India are dealing with spam messages, fake calls, and messages they never agreed to receive.


Companies also have to follow strict rules, and telecom operators must make sure everything is done properly.


In all this confusion, trust often gets lost (we all feel it, right?).


Tanla has built its business around fixing this trust problem.


Blockchain fits in perfectly here because it creates records that cannot be changed and can be checked anytime.


Instead of making a general blockchain product with no clear purpose, Tanla used the technology to solve a very real and very Indian challenge, one that many countries also face.

One clear example is TruBloq, Tanla’s blockchain-based platform that helps stop spam and unwanted messages in India. When the government introduced strict rules to control unsolicited communication, Tanla built TruBloq, so every message could be verified on a blockchain before reaching the user. This is solving a very local problem of mass spam and fraud.


That’s why Tanla’s platforms look different from normal enterprise tools. They come with a built-in “trust layer,” and blockchain is the technology that holds that layer together.


4. Blockchain Isn’t a Side Project


The big IT companies like TCS, Infosys, Wipro, HCLTech, and Tech Mahindra are all excellent in

their own ways. They also have blockchain teams. They also build trade finance solutions, supply chain pilots, and tokenisation platforms.


But their identity is not tied to blockchain.

Their revenues depend heavily on IT services, cloud operations, BPO, product engineering, and consulting.


If you asked someone what TCS or Infosys is, they would never say “a blockchain company.” Because blockchain is a small part of a very large empire.

Tanla, on the other hand, would lose a meaningful part of its product advantage if blockchain were removed.


That tells you everything about which company leans on blockchain in the “real sense.”


5. Tanla’s Domain Makes It Blockchain Buitable


Another reason Tanla’s use of blockchain stands out is the domain it works in – enterprise communication.


This sector deals with billions of messages every day: OTPs, promotional messages, transactional alerts, and more.


The biggest pain point is trust; enterprises must prove that a message is legitimate, unaltered, and compliant.


Blockchain solves exactly that. And Tanla solved it before it became fashionable and a dire necessity.


Instead of forcing blockchain into a problem, Tanla found a problem that genuinely needed blockchain.


That is rare. And it’s a sign of a company using technology for value, not for marketing.


Conclusion

To call a company a “blockchain company,” it should meet a simple test:


Does its business depend meaningfully on blockchain, and does it earn real revenue from blockchain-driven products?


Want to read more?

Subscribe to finsightsbysquareleague.com to keep reading this exclusive post.

bottom of page