What is "really" going on in Venezuela?

At first glance, the renewed tension between the United States and Venezuela looks familiar...sanctions, oil, geopolitics, and yet another flashpoint in Latin America. But this conflict is no longer just about barrels of crude or political ideology. It sits at the intersection of energy security, financial dominance, and a global power balance that is slowly shifting.

Markets reacted instantly. The US dollar strengthened after weeks of softness. Gold prices moved higher. Investors, once again, retreated to safety. These reactions tell us something important: this episode matters not because Venezuela is central to the global economy, but because it exposes the fragility of the system that still holds it together.

Venezuela in One Simple Paradox

In the late 1990s, Venezuela was a serious player in the oil world, producing around 3.2 million barrels a day. Today, that standing has faded sharply. Countries like Saudi Arabia, which regularly pumps 10-12 million barrels a day, and Iraq and the United Arab Emirates, each producing over 4 million barrels daily, still dominate global supply and can adjust output when markets shift. Venezuela’s production, by contrast, has fallen to 1 million barrels a day....a fraction of what it once produced. 

The key point is that the oil didn’t disappear. Years of underinvestment, ageing infrastructure, and operational decline made it harder to turn vast reserves into actual barrels, showing that in modern energy markets, production capacity matters far more than resources on paper. 

It also possesses vast gold deposits embedded in the ancient Guiana Shield. On paper, it should be an energy and resource heavyweight.

In reality, it isn’t.

What Venezuela has is "geological power". What it lacks is "economic power". And in modern markets, influence does not come from what you own....it comes from what you can reliably produce, sell, and settle.

How Venezuela Lost Oil Power Without Losing Oil

Venezuela’s oil story is not one of sudden collapse but of gradual erosion. Years of tighter state control, underinvestment, loss of technical capacity, and operational mismanagement weakened the country’s ability to turn reserves into revenue. Oil production fell, infrastructure aged, and flexibility disappeared.

Meanwhile, global energy markets evolved. Power shifted toward producers who could adjust output quickly, absorb price shocks, and remain dependable suppliers. Venezuela, despite its reserves, could do none of this consistently.

The result was simple: control increased, capacity shrank.

Why Middle Eastern Producers Still Matter More

This is where comparisons help. Middle Eastern oil producers dominate not because they have oil - many countries do - but because they have discipline, scale, and reliability. They can increase or cut supply, stabilise markets, and influence prices in real time.

Venezuela cannot.

This is why its influence inside OPEC faded. Not due to politics, but due to irrelevance in day-to-day market mechanics. Energy power today is about delivery, not declarations.

Gold: Venezuela’s Quiet Alternative

As oil revenues weakened and sanctions tightened, gold quietly became Venezuela’s second strategic asset. Unlike oil, gold does not require pipelines, shipping insurance, or dollar-based settlement systems. It can move discreetly and function as a hedge against financial isolation.

This is also why gold prices rose alongside geopolitical tensions. When uncertainty increases - especially around sanctions, conflict, or monetary dominance, investors instinctively turn to assets that sit outside political control.

But gold has limits. Informal mining, environmental damage, lack of transparency, and weak institutional oversight prevent it from becoming a stable economic anchor. It helps Venezuela survive, not recover.

Why the United States Is Really Involved

This conflict is not about the US needing Venezuelan oil. That era is long over. Instead, three deeper motivations are at play.

First, energy markets remain globally interconnected. Even if the US is more energy-independent, supply disruptions anywhere still affect prices everywhere. Stability matters.

Second, and more importantly, this is about financial architecture. Sanctions are not just punishment; they are enforcement tools. Venezuela represents a case where a country attempts to operate outside the dollar-dominated system, using alternative trade routes, currencies, and gold. Allowing such models to succeed unchecked weakens the credibility of sanctions everywhere.

Third, this is about signalling. The US response is a message not only to Venezuela, but to others exploring strategic distance - that drift comes with consequences.

The China Factor and the Slow Shift in Power

Venezuela’s growing ties with China and Russia do not replace US dominance, but they dilute it. This is the key distinction. Power today erodes at the margins. Influence weakens gradually, not dramatically.

From the US perspective, Venezuela is not ‘The Threat’, it is the example.

When the Economic Model Collapsed

Venezuela’s economic depression was not triggered by a single shock. It exposed long-standing weaknesses in an economy built almost entirely on oil. When prices fell, the lack of diversification and buffers became impossible to ignore.

The scale of that collapse becomes clearer when viewed side by side:

Indicator	2014	2025
GDP	USD 214.69 billion	USD 82.77 billion
Inflation	62.2%	269.9%
Oil production	2.33 mbpd	1.14 mbpd

mbpd = million barrels per day

In just over a decade, Venezuela lost more than half its economic output. Inflation entrenched instability, and oil production halved - not because reserves ran out, but because capacity, investment, and confidence collapsed. When a single-commodity model breaks, recovery is far harder than decline.

What the Market Reaction Tells Us

Markets didn’t overthink the escalation - they moved straight to safety. Since the strike, gold is up about 2.6%, while the US dollar has strengthened roughly ~1%.

That pairing is telling. The dollar’s move reflects a classic risk-off shift toward liquidity and scale. Gold’s rise shows investors are also hedging against geopolitical and monetary uncertainty. When both rise together, it signals caution, not optimism.

The Bigger Takeaway

Venezuela’s story is not about wasted resources. It is about the limits of resource power in a world governed by finance, trust, and systems. Oil and gold can create opportunity, but they cannot substitute for institutional strength or market credibility.

For the US, this conflict is less about reclaiming dominance and more about preventing its quiet erosion. For Venezuela, the challenge lies not beneath the ground, but in building an economy capable of turning resources into relevance.

Want to read more?

Subscribe to finsightsbysquareleague.com to keep reading this exclusive post.

Subscribe Now